Skip to content

fix(rabbitmq): Store IDs immediately after provisioning#1237

Open
cgoetz-inovex wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/STACKITTPR-390_store_ids_rabbitmq
Open

fix(rabbitmq): Store IDs immediately after provisioning#1237
cgoetz-inovex wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
feat/STACKITTPR-390_store_ids_rabbitmq

Conversation

@cgoetz-inovex
Copy link
Contributor

STACKITTPR-390

Description

relates to #1234

Checklist

  • Issue was linked above
  • Code format was applied: make fmt
  • Examples were added / adjusted (see examples/ directory)
  • Docs are up-to-date: make generate-docs (will be checked by CI)
  • Unit tests got implemented or updated
  • Acceptance tests got implemented or updated (see e.g. here)
  • Unit tests are passing: make test (will be checked by CI)
  • No linter issues: make lint (will be checked by CI)

@cgoetz-inovex cgoetz-inovex requested a review from a team as a code owner February 17, 2026 16:39
@github-actions
Copy link

Merging this branch will decrease overall coverage

Impacted Packages Coverage Δ 🤖
github.com/stackitcloud/terraform-provider-stackit/stackit/internal/services/rabbitmq/credential 23.65% (-0.24%) 👎
github.com/stackitcloud/terraform-provider-stackit/stackit/internal/services/rabbitmq/instance 25.14% (-0.42%) 👎

Coverage by file

Changed files (no unit tests)

Changed File Coverage Δ Total Covered Missed 🤖
github.com/stackitcloud/terraform-provider-stackit/stackit/internal/services/rabbitmq/credential/resource.go 29.27% (-0.36%) 164 (+2) 48 116 (+2) 👎
github.com/stackitcloud/terraform-provider-stackit/stackit/internal/services/rabbitmq/instance/resource.go 28.44% (-0.54%) 320 (+6) 91 229 (+6) 👎

Please note that the "Total", "Covered", and "Missed" counts above refer to code statements instead of lines of code. The value in brackets refers to the test coverage of that file in the old version of the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

Comments