Conversation
|
🚅 Deployed to the rivet-pr-4168 environment in rivet-frontend
|
How to use the Graphite Merge QueueAdd the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue. You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository. Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue. This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
Graphite Automations"Test" took an action on this PR • (02/10/26)1 assignee was added to this PR based on Kacper Wojciechowski's automation. |
PR Review: Add Ladle Component Development EnvironmentOverviewThis PR adds Ladle as a component development environment for the frontend, enabling isolated component development similar to Storybook but lighter weight. The implementation includes Docker setup, Railway deployment configuration, and foundational story infrastructure. ✅ Strengths
🔍 Issues & Concerns1. Incomplete Story Implementation (frontend/src/components/workflow/workflow.stories.tsx:1)export const World = () => <div>World</div>;This appears to be a placeholder/stub. The story:
Recommendation: Either implement a proper workflow story or remove this file if it's just for testing the infrastructure. 2. Missing Ladle ConfigurationThe
Example: export default {
viteConfig: ".ladle/vite.config.ts",
stories: "src/**/*.stories.{tsx,jsx}",
port: 61000, // or whatever port you prefer
};3. Dockerfile Duplication (frontend/ladle.Dockerfile)While the Ladle Dockerfile is similar to cloud.Dockerfile and inspector.Dockerfile, there are now three files with nearly identical builder stages. Consider:
4. Railway Configuration Question (frontend/railway.ladle.toml:3)watchPatterns = ["/frontend/**", "/pnpm-lock.yaml"]The Ladle build only watches Compare to inspector.Dockerfile which has the same dependencies but was removed. Recommendation: Either:
5. Missing DocumentationConsider adding:
6. Deleted File Without Explanation (railway.cloud-staging.toml)The
Recommendation: Add context to the PR description about why this file was removed. 🔒 Security✅ No security concerns identified:
⚡ Performance✅ Performance looks good:
🧪 Testing
Recommendation: Add at least one real component story to validate the entire pipeline works correctly. 📋 Additional Suggestions
🎯 SummaryThis PR provides solid infrastructure for Ladle integration, but the actual component story library is not yet implemented. The Docker and deployment setup is well-structured, but there are questions about:
Recommendation:
Overall, this is a good foundation but needs completion before it provides real value to the team. |
ee1c116 to
7d52277
Compare
7d52277 to
ed19db1
Compare
ed19db1 to
9801124
Compare
9801124 to
1a557d1
Compare
1a557d1 to
b2407e6
Compare
b2407e6 to
044bf2a
Compare
044bf2a to
c133769
Compare
c133769 to
7203012
Compare
7203012 to
06a1487
Compare
06a1487 to
a270bd5
Compare
a270bd5 to
111ecae
Compare
111ecae to
f8ea0fa
Compare
f8ea0fa to
aa5df64
Compare
aa5df64 to
995ac00
Compare
995ac00 to
e03420d
Compare

Description
Added Ladle component development environment to the frontend. This PR:
.gitignoreto exclude the Ladle build directoryLadle provides an isolated environment for developing and testing UI components, making it easier to build and maintain a consistent component library.
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Tested locally by running the Ladle development server and verifying that components can be viewed and interacted with in isolation.
Checklist: