chore: use typos instead of codespell #1015
Merged
+15
−11
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
notatallshaw
approved these changes
Jan 5, 2026
Member
notatallshaw
left a comment
notatallshaw
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have no strong opinion on this, but PR looks good.
This is a Rust spell checker with the same basic idea as codespell, but it supports CamelCase / snake_case, and has a more flexible configuraiton (not perfect). I've found it catches some things codespell doesn't, and it's fast (though codespell is pretty fast too). It's got more stars on github than codespell, and has been around for a while, and seems well maintained. I haven't been actively trying it out that long, though (since the Python Bytes mention). Signed-off-by: Henry Schreiner <henryschreineriii@gmail.com>
henryiii
force-pushed
the
henryiii/chore/typos
branch
from
b935c50 to
21f3892
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a Rust spell checker with the same basic idea as codespell, but it supports CamelCase / snake_case, and has a more flexible configuraiton (not perfect). I've found it catches some things codespell doesn't, and it's fast (though codespell is pretty fast too). It's got more stars on github than codespell, and has been around for a while, and seems well maintained. I haven't been actively trying it out that long, though (since the Python Bytes mention).
See scientific-python/cookie#724 and scikit-build/scikit-build-core#1192 for a couple of other conversions, both found a little more than codespell. Can't really tell if it's missing stuff codespell would have caught, though. If you want, I could keep both. :)