Skip to content

Conversation

@grokspawn
Copy link
Contributor

move the retrieval of binaries to bingo, because otherwise there is no version comparison here, and since the acquisition makes no version comparison, it's trivial to see version drift between the upstream and users' local environments, and there's no check to prevent this. Instead, a user would literally have to identify that some of the generated artifacts from make manifests shouldn't have been generated.

This new approach will make the version checks explicit, tied to go version dependency management, and independent of user environments.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from kevinrizza and tmshort January 27, 2026 21:20
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 37.86%. Comparing base (2dc4fea) to head (5459fac).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #471      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   37.78%   37.86%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        4557     4563       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits         1722     1728       +6     
  Misses       2678     2678              
  Partials      157      157              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Signed-off-by: grokspawn <jordan@nimblewidget.com>
@grokspawn grokspawn force-pushed the shift-tools-to-bingo branch from 5186aea to 21782a2 Compare January 27, 2026 21:25
Signed-off-by: grokspawn <jordan@nimblewidget.com>
Copy link
Member

@rashmigottipati rashmigottipati left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 28, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rashmigottipati
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign grokspawn for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants