test_runner: fix passing expectFailure

[MoLow]

No description provided.

[nodejs-github-bot]

Review requested:

• @nodejs/test_runner

[JakobJingleheimer]

Oh wow, how did I miss this before 😵‍💫

🙌

[MoLow]

Oh wow, how did I miss this before 😵‍💫

All new experimental features evolve one way or another 🫶🏼

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/71107/

[MoLow]

@aduh95 thanks for the fast approvals. I changed the behavior a bit to better play when both skip and expectFailure are set

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.77%. Comparing base (79ddd1b) to head (81d55bf).
⚠️ Report is 100 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #61568      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.53%   89.77%   +1.23%     
==========================================
  Files         704      673      -31     
  Lines      208876   203829    -5047     
  Branches    40330    39173    -1157     
==========================================
- Hits       184937   182980    -1957     
+ Misses      15922    13179    -2743     
+ Partials     8017     7670     -347     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
lib/internal/test_runner/test.js	97.32% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

... and 138 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.