Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Hmmm... I'm not sure it is a good idea to duplicate kernel sample xdpsock here... because that means that I/we have to maintain it it two places. I know that @magnus-karlsson are preparing a patchset that improves this sample, and I don't want to have to backport that work... |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
First of all thank you for this project. I had a hard time building the bpf/XDP samples in the kernel tree and this project worked much more smoothly.
This PR is adding the sample
xdpsockfrom the kernel tree which uses the new AF_XDP socket layer.