[AutoPR- Security] Patch cloud-hypervisor for CVE-2026-24799 [MEDIUM]

[azurelinux-security]

Auto Patch cloud-hypervisor for CVE-2026-24799.

Autosec pipeline run -> https://dev.azure.com/mariner-org/mariner/_build/results?buildId=1044343&view=results

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

• The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
• The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
• Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
• Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
• Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
• All package sources are available
• cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
• LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
• All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
• sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
• Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
• Ready to merge

---

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?

• Auto Patch cloud-hypervisor for CVE-2026-24799 (MEDIUM).

Change Log

• CVE-2026-24799

Does this affect the toolchain?

YES/NO

Associated issues

• N/A

Links to CVEs

• https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-24799

Test Methodology

• Pipeline build id: Buddy Build URL

[Kanishk-Bansal]

Buddy Build

[bhagyapathak]

Why patch 5 application is missing?

[Kanishk-Bansal]

It is not missing it is getting applied at https://github.com/azurelinux-security/azurelinux/blob/2aa085167e7e84e7ac093fd2d13761e5893a2683/SPECS/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor.spec#L92

[bhagyapathak]

Recommend differentiating patch scope via naming and grouping for clarity. Prefix patch filenames based on target (e.g., zlib-, cloud-hypervisor-). This will improve maintainability and reviewability.

[bhagyapathak]

Recommend differentiating patch scope via naming and grouping for clarity. Prefix patch filenames based on target (e.g., zlib-, cloud-hypervisor-). This will improves maintainability, reviewability.

[bhagyapathak]

Recommend differentiating patch scope via naming and grouping for clarity. Prefix patch filenames based on target (e.g., zlib-, cloud-hypervisor-). This will improve maintainability and reviewability.

[bhagyapathak]

Patch Analysis (Whether the patch applies cleanly/Backported/Minor Changes)

• Buddy Build
• patch applied during the build (check rpm.log)
• patch include an upstream reference
• PR has security tag
• ptest regression
  Approving with suggestion.