Skip to content

Conversation

@Bashamega
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 8, 2025

Thanks for the PR!

This section of the codebase is owned by @saschanaz - if they write a comment saying "LGTM" then it will be merged.

@saschanaz saschanaz self-requested a review December 9, 2025 09:35
function handleAdditionalTypes(node: Node) {
const additionalTypes = [];
for (const child of node.children) {
if (child.name === "additionalType") {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is assuming to repeat like

additionalType foo
additionalType bar

right? But maybe just additionalTypes foo bar, because it's always just a simple string?

@Bashamega Bashamega requested a review from saschanaz December 10, 2025 05:11
@Bashamega
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have updated it @saschanaz, and added a sample for multiple additionaltypes

@Bashamega Bashamega requested a review from saschanaz December 13, 2025 11:51
@Bashamega
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have fixed the broken code @saschanaz

@saschanaz
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 66fbabb into microsoft:main Dec 13, 2025
5 checks passed
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Merging because @saschanaz is a code-owner of all the changes - thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants