Use hardware channel activity detection for checking interference#1727
Open
weebl2000 wants to merge 1 commit intomeshcore-dev:devfrom
Open
Use hardware channel activity detection for checking interference#1727weebl2000 wants to merge 1 commit intomeshcore-dev:devfrom
weebl2000 wants to merge 1 commit intomeshcore-dev:devfrom
Conversation
|
Ok now this is very interesting. My house has LOS to 4 high level repeaters. I'll test this when I get back from work and see what happens. reminds me of busy channel lockout in shared 2 way radio repeaters back in the day before LTR / trunking. Could be onto something here for sure. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Using RSSI isn't very reliable (it's disabled in the code for a reason). We might try hw channel activity detection. Since we are gonna TX anyway it shouldn't be too bad to listen for a few milliseconds first. Worst case we see there is a transmission and we wait a little while. Alternative is that we just TX anyway and intefere with others causing transmission collisions.
Would be great if people could test this on their repeaters & companions and see if TX becomes more reliable.
You can build firmware for you device using https://mcimages.weebl.me?commitId=use-hardware-channel-activity-detection
First impressions after flashing this on one of my repeaters that is high up & exposed to a lot of other repeaters is that it responds a little more consistently. Sometimes it's snappier, but often times it's slightly slower but it fails way less. I.e. less failed status requests & non-answered commands.