SRE-565: Fix sync-turborepo not removing deleted workspace dependencies by TimDiekmann · Pull Request #8493 · hashintel/hash

TimDiekmann · 2026-02-27T13:00:38Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Fix sync-turborepo not removing workspace:* dependencies from package.json when a Rust crate is deleted from the workspace. Also improves error handling and adds documentation.

🔗 Related links

SRE-565

🔍 What does this change?

Fix stale dependency retention: The old approach filtered dependencies by querying yarn workspaces list for known package names. When a crate's package.json was deleted, its dependency entry survived as an apparent "external" package. Now filters by workspace:* version protocol instead, which correctly identifies all sync-managed dependencies regardless of whether the target package still exists.
Remove yarn/git subprocess calls: The get_yarn_workspace_packages() function (calling yarn workspaces list and git rev-parse) is no longer needed, making the sync faster and removing two external process dependencies.
Fix TOCTOU race in read_package_json: Replace try_exists + read_to_string with direct read_to_string and match on NotFound.
Improve write_package_json_if_changed: Replace .ok() (which swallowed all read errors) with an explicit match.
Add documentation: Module-level docs, struct docs, and # Errors sections on all fallible functions.

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Manual verification: cargo run --package hash-repo-chores --bin repo-chores-cli -- sync-turborepo (48 packages, 0 failures)
Verified that removing hash-graph-test-server from hash-graph's Cargo.toml correctly removes the @rust/hash-graph-test-server entry from package.json

❓ How to test this?

Remove a workspace dependency from any Cargo.toml
Run mise run sync-turborepo
Confirm the corresponding workspace:* entry is removed from the package.json

The retain filter used yarn workspace package names to clear managed dependencies before re-adding them from Cargo.toml. When a Rust crate was removed, its package.json disappeared from yarn workspaces, causing the stale dependency to survive the filter as an "external" package. Filter by `workspace:*` version protocol instead, which correctly identifies all sync-managed dependencies regardless of whether the target package still exists. This also removes the yarn/git subprocess calls that were only needed to build the workspace name list.

Fix TOCTOU race in read_package_json by reading directly and matching on NotFound instead of checking existence first. Make the change-check in write_package_json_if_changed explicit about both match arms. Add module-level documentation explaining the sync process, naming conventions, and available Cargo.toml metadata keys. Document all structs and fallible functions with # Errors sections.

vercel · 2026-02-27T13:00:42Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 27, 2026 1:11pm

3 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	Feb 27, 2026 1:11pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Feb 27, 2026 1:11pm
petrinaut	Skipped		Feb 27, 2026 1:11pm

cursor · 2026-02-27T13:00:43Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Changes how package.json dependency cleanup is detected (now by workspace:* protocol) and removes Yarn/Git subprocess discovery, which could affect dependency preservation for edge cases where workspace: is used intentionally outside this tool.

Overview
Fixes stale dependency retention in sync-turborepo by treating all workspace:* entries as sync-managed: existing deps/devDeps now drop VersionProtocol::Workspace(_) before re-adding workspace links from Cargo, so removed crates (or deleted package.jsons) no longer leave orphaned workspace dependencies behind.

Removes the Yarn/Git-based workspace discovery (yarn workspaces list + git rev-parse) and associated error variants, simplifying the sync flow and eliminating external subprocess calls.

Hardens file handling by avoiding TOCTOU checks in read_package_json, improving change-detection error handling in write_package_json_if_changed, and adding module/function # Errors documentation throughout.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 0922a13. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

augmentcode · 2026-02-27T13:02:28Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR fixes sync-turborepo so it reliably removes stale Rust workspace dependencies from generated package.json files.

Changes:

Switches dependency cleanup to filter by the workspace:* protocol, ensuring removed crates don’t leave behind “external” deps.
Removes the yarn workspace enumeration + git root discovery subprocesses, reducing external tooling coupling and speeding up sync.
Fixes a TOCTOU read path by reading package.json directly and treating NotFound as “create default”.
Makes the “write only if changed” logic more explicit (no blanket .ok()), and keeps output normalized via sorting.
Adds module/function documentation and # Errors sections to clarify behavior and failure modes.

Technical Notes: Workspace-managed dependencies are re-derived from Cargo metadata each run, while non-workspace JS dependencies are preserved across syncs.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 1 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

libs/@local/repo-chores/rust/src/sync_turborepo/mod.rs

Distinguish NotFound (expected for new files) from other I/O errors (permissions, invalid UTF-8) so they are observable via tracing::warn instead of being silently swallowed.

github-actions · 2026-02-27T14:19:09Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.509 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 334 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.508 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$14.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 104 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 142 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.520 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 198 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.821 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.830 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.236 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.11 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.813 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.46 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.856 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.53 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.194 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.423 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.248 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.453 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.424 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.25 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.329 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.292 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.270 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.684 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.16 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.488 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.55 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.991 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$41.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 482 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.954 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 208 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.722 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 250 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.412 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$57.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 372 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.43 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 194 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.55 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$424 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 610 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.2 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$89.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.90 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$301 \mathrm{ms} \pm 705 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.803 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.465 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.563 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 74.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 127 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.108 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$15.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.757 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.371 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 75.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.197 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.946 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$23.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 149 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.881 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.708 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.042 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$30.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.049 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$30.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$31.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.49 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 302 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.758 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.981 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 42.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.084 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$90.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 409 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$143 \mathrm{ms} \pm 443 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.179 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$99.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 648 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.82 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 580 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.346 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.112 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 402 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.768 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.006 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 400 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.190 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 416 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.118 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.005 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$133 \mathrm{ms} \pm 610 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.984 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$132 \mathrm{ms} \pm 559 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.492 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.751 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$586 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.46 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.993 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

TimDiekmann added 2 commits February 27, 2026 13:52

graphite-app bot assigned TimDiekmann Feb 27, 2026

github-actions bot added area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team labels Feb 27, 2026

TimDiekmann requested review from indietyp and lunelson February 27, 2026 13:01

augmentcode bot reviewed Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@local/repo-chores/rust/src/sync_turborepo/mod.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

SRE-565: Log unexpected read errors in write_package_json_if_changed

0922a13

Distinguish NotFound (expected for new files) from other I/O errors (permissions, invalid UTF-8) so they are observable via tracing::warn instead of being silently swallowed.

vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 27, 2026 13:03 Inactive

indietyp approved these changes Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

TimDiekmann enabled auto-merge February 27, 2026 13:06

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 27, 2026 13:11 View deployment

TimDiekmann added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 27, 2026

graphite-app bot requested review from a team February 27, 2026 13:13

Merged via the queue into main with commit e4abbb9 Feb 27, 2026
46 of 47 checks passed

TimDiekmann deleted the t/sre-565-fix-sync-turborepo-failing-after-removing-rust-dependency branch February 27, 2026 13:21

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

SRE-565: Fix sync-turborepo not removing deleted workspace dependencies#8493

SRE-565: Fix sync-turborepo not removing deleted workspace dependencies#8493
TimDiekmann merged 3 commits intomainfrom
t/sre-565-fix-sync-turborepo-failing-after-removing-rust-dependency

TimDiekmann commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2026

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Feb 27, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading