Skip to content

Conversation

@mstange
Copy link
Contributor

@mstange mstange commented Jan 22, 2026

Deploy preview

This transform avoids the need to drop callees manually if you want to see a flame graph for a single JS function but no other JS functions. With this transform, you can focus on the function's self while you're in the JS-only view, and then go back to the combined view to see any native functions involved in the execution of that JS function.

For example, in this profile, you can "focus self" on HTMLElement.click, and then change the implementation filter to "All Frames". This will show you the overhead on the way to calling the click handler, minus the time spent in the called JS code (profile). If you had just done "focus function" on HTMLElement.click, you would have seen all the time spent in callees too (profile), and you would have needed to drop each JS callee manually.

Screenshot 2026-01-22 at 4 29 47 PM

@mstange mstange requested a review from canova January 22, 2026 21:01
@mstange mstange self-assigned this Jan 22, 2026
@mstange mstange requested a review from a team as a code owner January 22, 2026 21:01
@mstange mstange force-pushed the focus-self-transform branch from d18cff3 to 62f75cd Compare January 22, 2026 21:01
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 22, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 71.42857% with 14 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.68%. Comparing base (ac4bb14) to head (7299b85).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/profile-logic/transforms.ts 74.41% 11 Missing ⚠️
src/components/shared/CallNodeContextMenu.tsx 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5774      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.71%   85.68%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         317      317              
  Lines       31216    31264      +48     
  Branches     8499     8602     +103     
==========================================
+ Hits        26756    26790      +34     
- Misses       4030     4044      +14     
  Partials      430      430              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@mstange mstange force-pushed the focus-self-transform branch 2 times, most recently from fec7650 to c470427 Compare January 22, 2026 21:35
.title = { CallNodeContextMenu--transform-focus-function-title }
CallNodeContextMenu--transform-focus-function-inverted = Focus on function (inverted)
.title = { CallNodeContextMenu--transform-focus-function-title }
CallNodeContextMenu--transform-focus-self-title =
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we expect self to be translated?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Depends on how the call tree's "Self" column is translated. I've added the following note, does that work?

# The translation for "self" in this string should match the translation used
# in CallTree--samples-self and CallTree--bytes-self. Alternatively it can be
# translated as "self values" or "self time" (though "self time" is less desirable
# because this menu item is also shown in "bytes" mode).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The note works, but we should add it also for the previous string. You can use a group-level comment (2 hashes), and reset it after this string.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

er wait, I did it wrong

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry about that, should be good now

This transform avoids the need to drop callees manually if you want to
see a flame graph for a single JS function but no other JS functions;
with this transform, you can focus on the function's self while you're
in the JS-only view, and then go back to the combined view to see any
native functions involved in the execution of that JS function.
@mstange mstange force-pushed the focus-self-transform branch from 4eb37eb to 5450567 Compare January 23, 2026 15:28
# $item (String) - Name of the function that transform applied to.
TransformNavigator--focus-function = Focus: { $item }
# "Focus self" transform.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here, worth adding a short note on "self" (no need for it to be as long as the other).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed, how does this look?

@mstange mstange force-pushed the focus-self-transform branch from 5450567 to 5d63c03 Compare January 23, 2026 15:53
@mstange mstange force-pushed the focus-self-transform branch from 5d63c03 to 7299b85 Compare January 23, 2026 15:55
Copy link
Contributor

@flodolo flodolo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants