Skip to content

Conversation

@promalert
Copy link
Contributor

Overview

fix some minor issues in the comments

Signed-off-by: promalert <promalert@outlook.com>
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @promalert, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses minor code hygiene by fixing small formatting inconsistencies within comments. The changes involve removing an extra space in a Go comment and cleaning up trailing whitespace in Rust documentation comments, contributing to overall code clarity and maintainability.

Highlights

  • Go Comment Formatting: Removed an extraneous space from a comment in da_submitter.go to enhance readability.
  • Rust Doc Comment Cleanup: Eliminated trailing whitespace from several doc comments in lib.rs, ensuring consistent formatting.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request addresses minor formatting issues within comments and documentation across da_submitter.go and lib.rs. The changes primarily involve removing extraneous whitespace from comment lines, which improves code cleanliness and consistency. The modifications are purely cosmetic and do not alter the functionality or logic of the code. The changes align with the PR title's objective of fixing minor comment issues.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.74%. Comparing base (360499b) to head (f07ccd7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2955      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.89%   58.74%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        8722     8722              
==========================================
- Hits         5137     5124      -13     
- Misses       2999     3011      +12     
- Partials      586      587       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 58.74% <ø> (-0.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit f14c6a7 into evstack:main Jan 7, 2026
30 of 34 checks passed
alpe added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2026
* main:
  chore: fix some minor issues in the comments (#2955)
  feat: make reaper poll duration configurable (#2951)
  chore!: move sequencers to pkg (#2931)
  feat: Ensure Header integrity on DA (#2948)
  feat(testda): add header support with GetHeaderByHeight method (#2946)
  chore: improve code comments clarity (#2947)
  chore(sequencers): optimize store check (#2945)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants