-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 190
Mark ImageDataAtSizeProvider as referenceable #2922
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Mark ImageDataAtSizeProvider as referenceable #2922
Conversation
Test Results156 files - 20 156 suites - 20 11s ⏱️ - 26m 3s Results for commit 845a9b3. ± Comparison against base commit 383ed2a. This pull request removes 4588 tests.♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
3ff2114 to
ad26c15
Compare
| Bundle-Vendor: %providerName | ||
| Bundle-SymbolicName: org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32.x86_64; singleton:=true | ||
| Bundle-Version: 3.133.0.qualifier | ||
| Bundle-Version: 4.0.0.qualifier |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fragments and host in SWT should match version. We are not moving to 4.0 for this one. Please add API tools commented API filter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Adding the commented API filter. from the eclipse quickfix does not seem to work, Can you give an example how to add the API filter, making a class referenceable
| * @since 3.132 | ||
| * @noreference This class is still experimental API and might be subject to | ||
| * change. | ||
| * @since 4.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since flag should not change. Just the noreference to be dropped.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you have the right baseline set in your IDE? It looks a bit odd that the generated filter references 3.131.0:
<message_argument value="3.133.0"/>
<message_argument value="3.131.0"/>
Maybe you have an outdated setup? You should do a "Perform Setup Tasks" and check you API baseline for if it contains the right SWT reference version (should be 3.132.0):

062c96b to
50b1d80
Compare
c48c783 to
4a5b73f
Compare
4a5b73f to
845a9b3
Compare

No description provided.