Skip to content

DAOS-18572 test: Fix rebuild/basic.py failure #17524

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
phender wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

DAOS-18572 test: Fix rebuild/basic.py failure #17524

phender wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@phender
Copy link
Contributor

@phender phender commented Feb 6, 2026

Remove system_ram_reserved setting now the test is running on HW.

Skip-unit-tests: true
Skip-fault-injection-test: true

Steps for the author:

  • Commit message follows the guidelines.
  • Appropriate Features or Test-tag pragmas were used.
  • Appropriate Functional Test Stages were run.
  • At least two positive code reviews including at least one code owner from each category referenced in the PR.
  • Testing is complete. If necessary, forced-landing label added and a reason added in a comment.

After all prior steps are complete:

  • Gatekeeper requested (daos-gatekeeper added as a reviewer).

@phender
DAOS-18572 test: Fix rebuild/basic.py failure
e264865 
Remove system_ram_reserved setting now the test is running on HW.

Skip-unit-tests: true
Skip-fault-injection-test: true

Signed-off-by: Phil Henderson <phillip.henderson@hpe.com>
@phender phender marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2026 17:38
@phender phender requested review from a team as code owners February 6, 2026 17:38
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 6, 2026

Ticket title is 'rebuild/basic.py:RbldBasic.test_rebuild_basic - Available memory (RAM) insufficient for configured 243 GiB ram-disk size'
Status is 'In Review'
https://daosio.atlassian.net/browse/DAOS-18572

daltonbohning
daltonbohning approved these changes Feb 6, 2026
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@daltonbohning daltonbohning left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Should this test also be using storage: auto now?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@daltonbohning daltonbohning daltonbohning approved these changes

@dinghwah dinghwah dinghwah approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@phender @daltonbohning @dinghwah