Skip to content

Conversation

@RomneyDa
Copy link
Collaborator

@RomneyDa RomneyDa commented Dec 12, 2025

Description

Opus is smart enough to interpret the previous prompt as "can only call in parallel with itself"


Summary by cubic

Clarified the editFile tool’s parallel-calling instruction to explicitly forbid running in parallel with any tools, including itself. Prevents misinterpretation and avoids concurrent edit conflicts.

Written for commit 41c4f29. Summary will update automatically on new commits.

@RomneyDa RomneyDa requested a review from a team as a code owner December 12, 2025 07:02
@RomneyDa RomneyDa requested review from sestinj and removed request for a team December 12, 2025 07:02
@continue
Copy link
Contributor

continue bot commented Dec 12, 2025

All Green - Keep your PRs mergeable

Learn more

All Green is an AI agent that automatically:

✅ Addresses code review comments

✅ Fixes failing CI checks

✅ Resolves merge conflicts

1 similar comment
@continue-development-app
Copy link

All Green - Keep your PRs mergeable

Learn more

All Green is an AI agent that automatically:

✅ Addresses code review comments

✅ Fixes failing CI checks

✅ Resolves merge conflicts

@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 12, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2025

✅ Review Complete

Code Review Summary

⚠️ AI review failed. Please check the Continue API key and configuration.

Troubleshooting

  • Verify the CONTINUE_API_KEY secret is set correctly
  • Check that the organization and config path are valid
  • Ensure the Continue service is accessible

@continue
Copy link
Contributor

continue bot commented Dec 12, 2025

No documentation updates needed for this PR. This change clarifies an internal LLM instruction for the editFile tool but doesn't affect user-facing behavior or features documented in our docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

@continue
Copy link
Contributor

continue bot commented Dec 12, 2025

The E2E test failure is unrelated to this PR - it's a CI infrastructure issue where the test setup failed to download VS Code from Microsoft's servers ("ReadError: The server aborted pending request"). The PR only changes an internal LLM instruction string and doesn't affect any test logic. This can be safely merged once the flaky CI test passes on re-run.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Status: Todo

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants