Skip to content

Script for timing large snapshot#2217

Draft
simonbaird wants to merge 1 commit intoconforma:mainfrom
simonbaird:large-snapshot-time-test
Draft

Script for timing large snapshot#2217
simonbaird wants to merge 1 commit intoconforma:mainfrom
simonbaird:large-snapshot-time-test

Conversation

@simonbaird
Copy link
Member

Not sure if we wanna merge this, but I'll push a draft PR to share my hacky script.

Somewhat on-topic for...

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/EC-976

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.27%. Comparing base (a2e1084) to head (e9d16c5).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2217   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.27%   68.27%           
=======================================
  Files         101      101           
  Lines        8409     8409           
=======================================
  Hits         5741     5741           
  Misses       2668     2668           
Flag Coverage Δ
generative 68.27% <ø> (ø)
integration 68.27% <ø> (ø)
unit 68.27% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@simonbaird simonbaird force-pushed the large-snapshot-time-test branch from 9737bd6 to eff7100 Compare April 24, 2025 18:32
@simonbaird
Copy link
Member Author

... rebased because I want to trigger some Konflux pipelines to confirm we didn't break production with redhat-appstudio/infra-deployments#6225 ...

@simonbaird
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Not sure if we wanna merge this, but I'll push a draft PR to share
my hacky script.

Somewhat on-topic for...

Ref: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/EC-976
@simonbaird simonbaird force-pushed the large-snapshot-time-test branch from eff7100 to e9d16c5 Compare April 24, 2025 18:43
@simonbaird
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant