Skip to content

Conversation

@js-goupil
Copy link
Contributor

@js-goupil js-goupil commented Jan 15, 2026

Closes https://github.com/shop/issues-retail/issues/22868

WHY are these changes introduced?

This adds the ability to specify in the toml, whether or not an extension supports offline_mode. This is a new feature for POS Extensions. The backend is already wired up to support this.

WHAT is this pull request doing?

  • Parses the toml extensions.supported_features offline_mode boolean to include its value in the deploy config.

How to test your changes?

  1. Check out this branch.
  2. Make sure your extension locally has this in the toml:
[extensions.supported_features]
  offline_mode = true
  1. run pnpm shopify app deploy --path [PATH_TO_APP]
  2. Go to your shop's graphiql and query the extensions endpoint. Make sure you query the config and supportedFeatures fields on the Extension object.

Post-release steps

  • Update POS/config documentation

Measuring impact

How do we know this change was effective? Please choose one:

  • n/a - this doesn't need measurement, e.g. a linting rule or a bug-fix
  • Existing analytics will cater for this addition
  • PR includes analytics changes to measure impact

Checklist

  • I've considered possible cross-platform impacts (Mac, Linux, Windows)
  • I've considered possible documentation changes

@js-goupil js-goupil force-pushed the 01-15-added_support_for_supported_features_in_toml branch from fe39235 to 71f5db9 Compare January 15, 2026 18:08
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
79.5% (+0.28% 🔼)
14349/18048
🟡 Branches
73.78% (+0.67% 🔼)
7092/9612
🟡 Functions
79.64% (+0.27% 🔼)
3666/4603
🟡 Lines
79.87% (+0.28% 🔼)
13566/16986
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / admin-as-app.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / metafield_definitions.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / metaobject_definitions.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-cancel.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-run-mutation.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-run-query.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / get-bulk-operation-by-id.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / list-bulk-operations.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / staged-uploads-create.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / fetch_store_by_domain.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🔴
... / import-custom-data-definitions.ts
0% 100% 0% 0%
🔴
... / cancel.ts
0% 100% 0% 0%
🔴
... / execute.ts
0% 0% 0% 0%
🔴
... / status.ts
0% 0% 0% 0%
🔴
... / pull.ts
0% 100% 0% 0%
🟡
... / execute-operation.ts
75% 50% 100% 75%
🔴
... / pull.ts
0% 0% 0% 0%
🟢
... / bulk-operation-status.ts
96.55% 92.11% 100% 100%
🟢
... / cancel-bulk-operation.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / constants.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / download-bulk-operation-results.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / execute-bulk-operation.ts
86.76% 83.67% 100% 88.06%
🟢
... / format-bulk-operation-status.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / run-mutation.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / run-query.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟡
... / stage-file.ts
73.53% 62.5% 85.71% 72.73%
🟢
... / watch-bulk-operation.ts
100% 94.74% 100% 100%
🟢
... / utilities.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / declarative-definitions.ts
98.54% 93.18% 100% 98.51%
🟢
... / common.ts
97.62% 95% 100% 97.06%
🟢
... / execute-command-helpers.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / file-formatter.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🔴
... / promiseWithResolvers.ts
33.33% 50% 50% 33.33%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🔴
... / execute.ts
0%
0% (-100% 🔻)
0% 0%
🟢
... / loader.ts
94.06% (+0.2% 🔼)
86.41% (-0.42% 🔻)
97.17% (+0.11% 🔼)
94.85% (+0.18% 🔼)
🟢
... / extension-instance.ts
84.8% (+0.23% 🔼)
77.6% (-0.91% 🔻)
92.06% (+0.13% 🔼)
85.11% (+0.24% 🔼)
🟡
... / specification.ts
69.64% (+0.55% 🔼)
75.61% (+2.44% 🔼)
76.47% (-1.31% 🔻)
69.39% (+0.64% 🔼)
🟢
... / ui_extension.ts
87.9% (-6.93% 🔻)
77.19% (-4.06% 🔻)
85.19% (-14.81% 🔻)
90.07% (-6.39% 🔻)
🟢
... / store-context.ts
100%
82.35% (-0.98% 🔻)
100% 100%
🟢
... / Logs.tsx
90%
90.91% (-5.97% 🔻)
100% 90%
🟢
... / fetch.ts
84.21% (+0.88% 🔼)
82.35% (-0.98% 🔻)
75%
85.29% (+1.42% 🔼)
🟢
... / app-event-watcher-handler.ts
86.36% (-4.11% 🔻)
75% 86.67%
85.71% (-5.19% 🔻)
🔴
... / server.ts
1.23% (-0.02% 🔻)
0% 0%
1.3% (-0.02% 🔻)
🟢
... / bundle.ts
93.22%
63.33% (-3.33% 🔻)
94.12% (+5.88% 🔼)
96.3%
🟢
... / developer-platform-client.ts
84.62% (-1.5% 🔻)
71.43% (+0.84% 🔼)
81.82% (+1.82% 🔼)
93.75% (+0.42% 🔼)
🔴
... / http-reverse-proxy.ts
58.97% (-4.91% 🔻)
37.04% (-2.96% 🔻)
58.33% (-5.3% 🔻)
59.46% (-5.25% 🔻)
🔴
... / app-management-client.ts
53.69% (-0.16% 🔻)
47.47%
50% (-0.45% 🔻)
52.53% (-0.17% 🔻)
🟢
... / api.ts
87.07% (-0.43% 🔻)
76.71% (-0.1% 🔻)
100%
86.49% (-0.43% 🔻)
🟢
... / device-authorization.ts
88.24% (-0.83% 🔻)
76.47% (-2.94% 🔻)
100%
88.24% (-0.83% 🔻)
🟢
... / SingleTask.tsx
84.21% (-15.79% 🔻)
50% (-50% 🔻)
80% (-20% 🔻)
84.21% (-15.79% 🔻)
🔴
... / environment.ts
35% (-5% 🔻)
41.18%
40% (-10% 🔻)
36.84% (-5.26% 🔻)
🔴
... / ui.tsx
50.82% (-0.79% 🔻)
42.86% (-5.53% 🔻)
54.55% (+1.42% 🔼)
50% (-0.82% 🔻)
🟢
... / console.ts
81.82% (+15.15% 🔼)
75% (-25% 🔻)
100% (+33.33% 🔼)
81.82% (+15.15% 🔼)
🟢
... / init.ts
88% (-0.89% 🔻)
71.43% (+4.76% 🔼)
86.67% (+4.85% 🔼)
88% (-0.89% 🔻)
🟢
... / storefront-renderer.ts
90.2% (-0.54% 🔻)
78.95%
81.82% (-1.52% 🔻)
90.2% (-0.54% 🔻)
🟡
... / theme-polling.ts
67.12% (-0.93% 🔻)
68.75% 78.57%
66.67% (-0.98% 🔻)

Test suite run success

3676 tests passing in 1431 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from f903c47

@js-goupil js-goupil marked this pull request as ready for review January 19, 2026 16:27
@js-goupil js-goupil requested a review from a team as a code owner January 19, 2026 16:27
},
},
supportedFeatures: {
supportsOffline: extension.configuration.supported_features?.offline_mode ?? false,
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dev payloads use camel casing, unlike the deployed configs, which use snake case.

@js-goupil js-goupil force-pushed the 01-15-added_support_for_supported_features_in_toml branch 3 times, most recently from 282c402 to 861716b Compare January 19, 2026 18:42
@js-goupil js-goupil force-pushed the 01-15-added_support_for_supported_features_in_toml branch from 861716b to f903c47 Compare January 20, 2026 18:18
@js-goupil js-goupil requested a review from vividviolet January 20, 2026 18:18
Copy link
Member

@vividviolet vividviolet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants