Merged
Conversation
rafaeelaudibert
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 8, 2026
This is a syntax error in Python 3.8+ (it was deprecated earlier and became an error). The return statement should be moved outside the finally block. We've never noticed this, but we can see it because of the new github action added on #404
rafaeelaudibert
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
in #361 a user had to report that using the SDK printed a syntax warning
let's not wait
add a CI job that imports posthog and fails if there is a syntax warning
this will fail until #361 is merged