changed field styles

[sahehb]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

A preview of b493266 is uploaded and can be seen here:

✨ https://mevislab.github.io/examples/pull/136/ ✨

Changes may take a few minutes to propagate. Since this is a preview of production, content with draft: true will not be rendered. The source is here: https://github.com/MeVisLab/examples/tree/gh-pages/pull/136/

[okonrad]

I think we should think and discuss about it again.

On the one hand, we should not style everything, on the other hand, we should make it clear if we mean a field, a value, code, or an attribute. For the reader and for future writers.

For fields, we have a <field>fieldName</field>. Maybe rename it to <fieldName>fieldName</fieldName> to make it clearer.

Values do not have to be styled, but it would be nice to easily see them. Maybe just use a monospaced font without any color change. Maybe we can use <fieldValue>fieldValue</fieldValue> or something similar.

Code should be styled as code, like code in here (monospaced font with a background). Examples for code are internalName = FooBar and expandX = Yes.

Attributes are similar to code and could be styled similar - if at all. Examples for attributes are MinDistance (in a vessel skeleton) and type (in an MDL declaration of a new field).