-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
chore: reorganize docs with snippet references and diagrams #59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughLarge documentation overhaul: reflowed and reorganized many docs, replaced numerous inline code examples with external snippet references, added Mermaid diagrams and new pages, adjusted mkdocs/snippet config and styles, and added OpenAPI/swagger UI attributes and a router tag for saved scripts. No functional public API changes. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(Skipped — changes are primarily documentation, minor metadata, and not a new multi-component control-flow feature.) Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
Pre-merge checks✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/architecture/model-conversion.md (2)
103-151: Update repository examples with correct class names and implementations.The three repository examples contain critical discrepancies from the actual codebase:
DomainMetadatadoes not exist — the codebase usesEventMetadata(defined in bothbackend/app/db/docs/event.pyandbackend/app/domain/events/event_models.py).
SessionDocumentandSessionUpdatedo not exist — there are no session-related document or update classes in the repository.
update_session()method does not exist —EventRepositoryhasstore_event()andget_event()but no update method for sessions.Metadata handling is incorrect in examples:
- The
store_event()example incorrectly shows manual metadata enum conversion; the actual implementation passes data directly toEventDocument(**data).- The
get_event()example incorrectly shows wrapping metadata withDomainMetadata(**doc.metadata.model_dump()); the actual implementation simply usesEvent(**doc.model_dump(exclude={"id", "revision_id"})).Replace the
update_sessionexample with an actual repository method or remove it entirely. Correct the metadata handling to match actual implementations inbackend/app/db/repositories/event_repository.py.
43-101: Update code examples to match actual codebase usage.The conversion patterns documentation contains examples that don't consistently align with actual implementation:
Dataclass to dict (lines 51–55): ✓ Correctly documented—the exact enum handling pattern with
hasattr(v, "value")is used inadmin_events_repository.py:225andreplay_repository.py:73.Pydantic to dict (lines 63–64): Partially incorrect—The
model_dump(mode="json")example is correct (used inredis_bus.py:69), butmodel_dump(exclude_none=True)is not used in the codebase. Instead, the codebase usesmodel_dump_json(exclude_none=True)(found insse_service.py:258, 262). Update line 63 to reflect this.Pydantic to Pydantic (lines 81–84): ✓ Correctly documented—
from_attributes=Trueconfigs exist in multiple schemas (e.g.,admin_user_overview.py,replay_models.py), andmodel_validate()is extensively used throughout.Dict to dataclass (lines 95–100): Pattern not found—The
DomainMetadataclass does not exist in the codebase, and this nested conversion pattern is not used in actual repositories. Either replace with a real example from the domain layer or remove if it's only theoretical guidance.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/architecture/event-storage.md (1)
91-99: Consider snippet reference maintenance strategy.The documentation restructuring successfully externalizes code examples, improving maintainability. However, hard-coded line ranges in snippet markers can become stale when source files are modified.
Consider documenting a process for:
- Validating snippet references during CI/CD
- Using named markers in source files (if pymdownx.snippets supports them) instead of line ranges
- Periodic audits of documentation snippet accuracy
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
docs/architecture/domain-exceptions.mddocs/architecture/event-storage.mddocs/architecture/model-conversion.mddocs/architecture/user-settings-events.mddocs/operations/nginx-configuration.mddocs/operations/notification-types.mdmkdocs.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
- GitHub Check: Build Frontend
🔇 Additional comments (14)
mkdocs.yml (1)
82-85: LGTM! Snippet configuration supports documentation refactoring.The expanded
base_pathconfiguration correctly enables snippet resolution from both the repository root and docs directory, which is necessary for the--8<--markers used throughout the restructured documentation files.docs/architecture/user-settings-events.md (2)
47-56: Mermaid diagram syntax is correct.The flowchart effectively visualizes the settings reconstruction process with cache flow.
12-13: All snippet references in the documentation are valid and accurate. The referenced files exist with sufficient line counts, and each code snippet range points to meaningful content:
user.py:72:86references theUserSettingsUpdatedEventclass (valid)user_settings_service.py:22:24references TypeAdapter definitions (valid)user_settings_service.py:88:120references theupdate_user_settingsmethod (valid)user_settings_service.py:243:254references the_apply_eventmethod (valid)user_settings_service.py:34:40references cache initialization (valid)user_settings_service.py:58:68references theinitializemethod (valid)user_settings_service.py:171:189references theget_settings_historymethod (valid)No updates needed.
docs/operations/nginx-configuration.md (2)
8-13: Mermaid diagram clearly illustrates architecture.The flowchart effectively shows the routing between browser, Nginx, backend, and static files.
23-24: Verify nginx configuration snippet references in documentation.The documentation references specific line ranges from
frontend/nginx.conf.templateandfrontend/Dockerfile.prod. Confirm that:
- Referenced files exist at the expected locations
- Line ranges (nginx.conf.template: 1:6, 8:13, 15:25, 27:54, 57:75, 77:84; Dockerfile.prod: 12:21) match the actual file content
- Updates to source files are reflected in documentation line numbers
Applies to lines: 23-24, 35-36, 44-45, 60-61, 76-77, 85-86, 123-124
docs/architecture/event-storage.md (2)
44-53: Mermaid diagram effectively visualizes write flow.The graph clearly shows the event flow from application code through KafkaEventService, EventStore, Kafka, and back to EventStoreConsumer.
15-16: Verify snippet references for event storage code.The documentation references specific line ranges in event storage implementation files. Ensure these remain accurate as the code evolves.
Review the following referenced files and line ranges:
backend/app/db/docs/event.py:30:45backend/app/events/event_store.py:18:26, 56:64backend/app/domain/replay/models.py:13:31, 49:90Also applies to documentation lines: 24-25, 30-31, 78-79, 84-85
Verify that:
- All referenced files exist in the repository
- The specified line ranges do not exceed the total line count of each file
- The
--8<--snippet inclusion syntax indocs/architecture/event-storage.mdcorrectly points to these ranges- The snippet content accurately reflects the current state of the implementation files
docs/architecture/domain-exceptions.md (1)
89-90: All snippet references in the documentation are valid and point to correct code locations. The referenced line ranges contain meaningful, complete code:
backend/app/domain/saga/exceptions.py:11:17contains theSagaAccessDeniedErrorclassbackend/app/domain/notification/exceptions.py:11:18contains theNotificationThrottledErrorclassbackend/app/core/exceptions/handlers.py:17:44contains exception handler configuration codeNo updates needed to these snippet references.
docs/operations/notification-types.md (3)
6-16: Architecture diagram is clear.The Mermaid diagram effectively visualizes the notification flow from execution events through the NotificationService to multiple delivery channels. The structure aligns well with the subsequent sections.
60-86: Snippet markers are correctly configured and line ranges are valid.The mkdocs configuration includes the
pymdownx.snippetsplugin with proper base path resolution. All three snippet markers reference valid line ranges inbackend/app/services/notification_service.py:
- Lines 76–101:
check_throttlemethod (throttling logic)- Lines 156–160:
_channel_handlersdict (channel routing)- Lines 801–823:
_should_skip_notificationmethod (subscription filtering)No issues detected.
88-94: All GitHub links verified and are current.The three backend files referenced in the Key files section all exist at the correct paths in the repository. The GitHub links in the documentation are properly formatted and point to the correct files in the
mainbranch:
services/notification_service.py✓db/docs/notification.py✓db/repositories/notification_repository.py✓docs/architecture/model-conversion.md (3)
5-10: Architecture rationale is well-articulated.The "Why these patterns" section clearly explains the separation of concerns across layers and emphasizes that conversion happens at boundaries (repositories/services), not inside models. This rationale supports the detailed patterns that follow.
12-35: Layer diagram effectively illustrates conversion boundaries.The Mermaid diagram clearly shows the four layers (API, Service, Domain, Infrastructure) and their connections. The bidirectional arrows between API↔Service and Service↔Domain/Infrastructure correctly represent where conversions occur.
163-171: Quick reference table is a useful lookup resource.The table at lines 163–171 provides a concise summary of conversion methods for common patterns (Dataclass ↔ Dict, Pydantic ↔ Dict, Dict ↔ Dataclass, Pydantic ↔ Pydantic). This complements the detailed sections above and serves as a practical reference for developers.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
docs/testing/load-testing.md (1)
33-47: Fix environment variables table: incorrect default for LOAD_BASE_URL and missing variables.The documented default for
LOAD_BASE_URLis incorrect. The code (backend/tests/load/config.py:13) useshttps://[::1]:443(IPv6 localhost), nothttps://localhost:443. Additionally, six environment variables are missing from the table:
LOAD_RAMP(default:5) — Ramp-up time in secondsLOAD_ENABLE_SSE(default:true) — Enable SSE endpoint testingLOAD_ENABLE_SCRIPTS(default:true) — Enable saved scripts endpoint testingLOAD_ENABLE_SETTINGS(default:true) — Enable user settings endpoint testingLOAD_ENABLE_NOTIFICATIONS(default:true) — Enable notifications endpoint testingLOAD_OUTPUT_DIR(default:tests/load/out) — Output directory for reportsUpdate the table to include the correct
LOAD_BASE_URLdefault and add these missing variables.
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
docs/architecture/model-conversion.md (1)
166-174: Quick reference table useful, but minor inconsistencies with earlier sections.The quick-reference table effectively summarizes conversion methods. However, note these minor discrepancies:
- Line 170 (Dataclass→Dict): Shows the full dict comprehension with enum handling. Consider simplifying to
asdict(obj)(with enum handling) or noting "see Dataclass to dict section above."- Line 171 (Pydantic→Dict): Shows bare
obj.model_dump(), but the detailed section recommendsexclude_none=Trueand/ormode="json"depending on use case. Quick-ref could note these as common variants.These are minor and don't break clarity, but standardizing the level of detail could help.
docs/stylesheets/extra.css (1)
173-176: Consider accessibility when hiding the Swagger filter inputUsing
display: none !importantfully removes the operation filter from both sighted users and assistive tech. If the goal is just to declutter visually while keeping it available for screen readers or power users, consider an “sr-only”/visually-hidden pattern or moving this control elsewhere instead of hard-hiding it.docs/reference/openapi.json (1)
7563-7802: Replay filter extensions look coherent; verify schema symmetry is intentionalExtending
ReplayFilterwithevent_ids,correlation_id,aggregate_id, andexclude_event_typesand mirroringexclude_event_typesinReplayFilterSchemamakes the replay APIs more expressive and consistent with other request models (e.g.,EventReplayRequestand event filters). Typing and shapes all look correct.One thing to double‑check:
ReplayFilternow supports additional keys (event_ids,correlation_id,aggregate_id) thatReplayFilterSchemadoes not. IfReplayFilterSchemais meant to represent the same conceptual filter (e.g., persisted replay configs shown back via the API), you may want them to stay in sync; if configs are intentionally narrower than ad‑hoc filters, the current asymmetry is fine.docs/architecture/idempotency.md (1)
118-118: Minor: Consider tighter phrasing for "Key lookups that created new records".The phrase "created new records" is slightly verbose. Consider alternatives like "created records" or simply "new key registrations" for conciseness.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
backend/app/api/routes/saved_scripts.pydocs/architecture/authentication.mddocs/architecture/execution-queue.mddocs/architecture/idempotency.mddocs/architecture/middleware.mddocs/architecture/model-conversion.mddocs/architecture/rate-limiting.mddocs/architecture/runtime-registry.mddocs/components/saved-scripts.mddocs/index.mddocs/operations/admin-api.mddocs/operations/deployment.mddocs/operations/grafana-integration.mddocs/operations/logging.mddocs/operations/metrics-reference.mddocs/reference/api-reference.mddocs/reference/openapi.jsondocs/stylesheets/extra.cssdocs/testing/frontend-testing.mddocs/testing/kafka-test-stability.mddocs/testing/load-testing.mdmkdocs.yml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (6)
- docs/architecture/rate-limiting.md
- docs/testing/frontend-testing.md
- docs/architecture/middleware.md
- docs/architecture/execution-queue.md
- docs/operations/grafana-integration.md
- docs/components/saved-scripts.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/operations/deployment.md
[uncategorized] ~401-~401: The official name of this software platform is spelled with a capital “H”.
Context: ...yaml) | Production overrides | | [.github/workflows/docker.yml](https://github.c...
(GITHUB)
docs/architecture/idempotency.md
[style] ~118-~118: ‘new records’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ache_misses- Key lookups that created new records -idempotency_duplicates_blocked` - Ev...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_NEW_RECORDS)
docs/operations/metrics-reference.md
[grammar] ~52-~52: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ... | ### Rate Limit Metrics Track rate limiting behavior. | Metric ...
(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: E2E Tests
- GitHub Check: Integration Tests
🔇 Additional comments (43)
docs/testing/kafka-test-stability.md (3)
5-5: Documentation rewording improves clarity and conciseness.The textual changes effectively streamline explanations of the problem, race condition, and related technical details without losing accuracy. The reflow reads naturally and maintains appropriate technical depth.
Also applies to: 11-12, 16-19
50-68: Inline code examples in alternative approaches are appropriate.Keeping code examples inline for the alternative solutions (pytest marks and fixture) is the right call—they provide complete context for readers exploring options. The extraction of only the primary fix to an external reference maintains a good balance between documentation conciseness and readability.
23-28: Snippet reference verified and correctly configured.The external snippet reference is valid and will render correctly:
- File
backend/app/events/core/producer.pyexists and lines 22–24 contain the lock initialization code with documentation comments- MkDocs snippets extension (
pymdownx.snippets) is configured inmkdocs.yml- The line range captures the complete lock definition and its explanatory context
No action needed.
docs/architecture/model-conversion.md (4)
5-39: Clear architectural narrative with effective diagram.The reframed introduction and Mermaid diagram effectively communicate the layered architecture and boundary-based conversion principle. The visual separation of API, Service, Domain, and Infrastructure layers is much clearer than before.
40-100: Well-chosen conversion patterns with practical examples.The conversion patterns cover the common cases (dataclass→dict, Pydantic↔dict, Pydantic↔Pydantic, dict→dataclass) with clear, idiomatic code. Enum handling (lines 50–52) and nested object conversion (lines 94–98) are particularly useful.
Please confirm that Pydantic v2 is the project requirement, as all examples use v2 syntax (
model_dump(),model_validate(),ConfigDict).
102-150: Concrete repository examples reinforce layer boundaries.The save/load/update examples effectively demonstrate the repository as a conversion boundary. Patterns are consistent with the earlier conversion guidance and show realistic use of
asdict()andmodel_dump()with nested object handling.Verify that the document and domain types referenced (EventDocument, SessionDocument, Event, DomainMetadata, SessionUpdate) exist in the codebase and follow the patterns shown. If external code snippets are referenced in the PR title's "snippet references," confirm these examples are accurate pointers or should be replaced with linked references.
152-164: Anti-patterns clarification resolves prior concern, but could be more explicit.The addition at lines 162–164 effectively addresses the previous review's concern by acknowledging that thin wrappers like
BaseEvent.to_dict()andto_public_dict()are acceptable. However, the distinction could be even clearer: the anti-pattern is manually listing fields, not the existence of wrapper methods that delegate to framework utilities.Consider explicitly scoping the guidance to make this distinction sharper:
"Thin wrappers that delegate to
model_dump()with specific options are acceptable—e.g.,BaseEvent.to_dict()appliesby_alias=True, mode="json"consistently. Similarly, methods with additional behavior like filtering private keys (to_public_dict()) are fine. The anti-pattern is manually listing and mapping fields without a clear abstraction."This makes it explicit that the existing patterns are acknowledged and encouraged.
Verify that
BaseEvent.to_dict()exists inbackend/app/infrastructure/kafka/events/base.pyand uses the pattern described (thin wrapper withby_alias=True, mode="json"or similar).docs/testing/load-testing.md (5)
3-5: Clear and concise introduction. ✓The reworded description effectively scopes the suite and sets expectations without excessive detail.
9-16: Verify client count default and clarify quick-start override.The quick start command specifies
--clients 30, but the Environment variables section below listsLOAD_CLIENTS=25as the default. This inconsistency may confuse users about the actual defaults. Either update the command to use the default (25) or explain why the override is recommended.Additionally, verify that the inline options list (line 15–16) is exhaustive. If there are other CLI options not listed, consider expanding the description.
18-18: Clarify default report output path in quick start.The quick start command (line 12) does not specify
--output, which means it uses a default directory. Ensure the default path matches the documented path shown here. Consider adding a note that--outputis optional and defaults tobackend/tests/load/out/.
49-60: Good expansion of metrics and implementation details. ✓The expanded section provides helpful context about covered endpoints, metrics collection, and implementation patterns (CSRF tokens, SSE sampling). This will help users understand the test suite's scope and implementation.
Please verify that the GitHub link on line 61 correctly points to the
tests/load/directory (currently targetsmainbranch). If this PR is being merged tomain, the link should be accurate; otherwise, it may need adjustment after merge.
20-31: Verify property-based test file and test names exist, and standardize path format with Quick start section.The property-based fuzz tests section references
backend/tests/load/test_property_monkey.pyand specific test names (test_register_never_500,test_grafana_webhook_never_500). Confirm these exist and that the pytest command will run successfully.Additionally, this section uses an explicit file path (
backend/tests/load/...), while the Quick start section uses a module import path (python -m tests.load.cli). Standardize the path format for consistency — either usepython -m tests.load.test_property_monkeyor update Quick start to use explicit paths.docs/stylesheets/extra.css (1)
135-142: Table layout tweaks look fineForcing
.md-typeset__tableto full width and keeping unclassed tables asdisplay: tablewith a smaller font is a straightforward readability improvement and shouldn’t affect behavior.backend/app/api/routes/saved_scripts.py (1)
14-14: Router-leveltags=["scripts"]is appropriate and consistentTagging the
saved_scriptsrouter with"scripts"matches the/scriptspaths and the OpenAPI grouping, and won’t affect runtime behavior.Please just confirm that
"scripts"matches any existing OpenAPI tag definitions or UI expectations (e.g., section names in the docs) so you don’t accidentally create duplicate/near-duplicate tag groups.docs/reference/openapi.json (1)
620-808: Scripts endpoints tagging is consistent and helpfulAdding
"scripts"tags to all/api/v1/scriptsand/api/v1/scripts/{script_id}operations aligns nicely with the router metadata and will group these routes cleanly in Swagger/clients without changing behavior.docs/reference/api-reference.md (1)
1-3: Swagger UI options align well with the updated OpenAPI structureEnabling
deepLinking="true"anddocExpansion="list"should make navigating the now tag‑grouped API (e.g.,"scripts") easier without altering request/response semantics.docs/operations/admin-api.md (1)
18-18: [Unable to complete verification - repository access failed]docs/operations/logging.md (2)
9-16: No action required. Thepymdownx.superfencesextension with Mermaid support is already properly configured inmkdocs.ymlwith a custom fence formermaidtype, enabling the flowchart diagram to render correctly.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
24-26: All snippet references and line ranges are correct. Thepymdownx.snippetsextension is enabled in mkdocs.yml with proper configuration, both line ranges (110-147 and 35-59) exist in backend/app/core/logging.py, and the content matches the descriptions (setup_logger function and sanitization logic respectively).docs/architecture/runtime-registry.md (1)
22-24: All snippet references are correctly configured and valid.The
pymdownx.snippetsextension is properly enabled inmkdocs.yml,backend/app/runtime_registry.pyexists, and all four referenced line ranges (6-10, 12-17, 19-50, 52-78) are valid within the file's 186 lines. The snippets will render correctly in the documentation.docs/operations/metrics-reference.md (2)
1-168: Comprehensive metrics reference with clear structure and practical examples.The documentation effectively covers all metric categories with detailed tables, configuration guidance, and real PromQL examples. The architecture explanation is clear, and the Key Files section provides helpful navigation to implementation details.
11-11: Snippet reference is correctly configured and paths verified.The mkdocs-snippets plugin is properly configured in mkdocs.yml with appropriate base paths, and the file
backend/app/core/metrics/base.pyexists with 79 lines. Lines 13-19 contain the MetricsConfig dataclass definition as expected for the metrics initialization code snippet.docs/architecture/idempotency.md (2)
9-33: Mermaid flowchart clearly illustrates idempotency decision logic.The architecture diagram effectively shows the key decision points: duplicate detection, timeout handling, and retry pathways. Subgraph organization makes the flow easy to follow.
1-129: Thorough idempotency architecture documentation with excellent visual aids.Clear explanation of strategies, lifecycle, middleware integration, and configuration. The flowchart and structured sections make this accessible to both implementers and maintainers.
docs/architecture/authentication.md (3)
8-30: Sequence diagram effectively illustrates JWT + CSRF authentication flow.The diagram clearly shows the login process with token generation and the pattern for subsequent authenticated requests with CSRF validation. Good visual representation of the double-submit CSRF pattern.
1-145: Comprehensive authentication architecture with clear frontend and backend flows.Excellent documentation covering the full authentication lifecycle, CSRF protection, session handling, and offline-first considerations. The sequence diagram and code snippets provide both architectural overview and implementation details. Security best practices (httpOnly cookies, CSRF validation, token expiration) are well-explained.
127-127: Configuration is correct — all swagger-ui and openapi.json references are properly set up.The swagger-ui-tag plugin is enabled in mkdocs.yml, docs/reference/openapi.json exists with authentication-tagged endpoints, and the filter="authentication" parameter is fully supported by the plugin for pre-filtering to endpoints matching that tag.
docs/index.md (6)
6-26: LGTM! Clear and concise quick start instructions.The simplified deployment flow with the service table and verification step provides a good user experience for getting started quickly.
28-30: Good troubleshooting addition.This note proactively addresses a common metrics issue users encounter.
32-48: Excellent restructuring with the language versions table.The tabular format makes it much easier to scan supported languages and versions compared to prose descriptions.
54-67: Great addition of the architecture diagram.The mermaid flowchart provides a clear visual overview of the system's data flow.
114-140: Well-chosen Python 3.10+ example.The code demonstrates modern Python features (TypeGuard, match statement) and the expected output is correct.
84-108: All linked documentation files exist in the repository. No action required.mkdocs.yml (3)
84-87: Critical configuration for snippet references.The
base_pathconfiguration is correctly set to support the snippet references (--8<--markers) used throughout the documentation. The dual paths (.anddocs) provide flexibility for referencing both repository root files and docs-relative files.
14-15: Ensure the logo asset file exists in the repository.The
mkdocs.ymlreferencesassets/images/logo.pngfor both logo and favicon. Verify thatdocs/assets/images/logo.pngis included in this PR or already present in the repository.
111-156: All newly added navigation entries reference existing files.All 10 newly referenced documentation files are present in the repository: authentication, rate-limiting, idempotency, execution-queue, runtime-registry, middleware, saved-scripts, metrics-reference, grafana-integration, and admin-api.
docs/operations/deployment.md (7)
7-28: Excellent architectural overview diagram.The mermaid flowchart clearly illustrates the deployment architecture and how local/production modes share container images.
76-92: Clear visualization of the Docker build strategy.The diagram effectively communicates the multi-stage build approach and dependency caching strategy.
130-141: Useful healthcheck reference table.The consolidated healthcheck commands provide a quick reference for troubleshooting service availability.
211-215: Thevalues.yamlfile reference and line range are correct.helm/integr8scode/values.yamlexists and lines 10-19 contain relevant configuration examples includingimagePullPolicyandimageRegistrywith appropriate documentation.
32-36: Snippet reference is valid. Thedeploy.shfile exists at the repository root and lines 6-18 contain meaningful usage documentation for the script's available commands.
393-401: Reference table for key deployment files is well-organized and accurate.All files referenced in the table exist in the repository and are correctly linked. The descriptions clearly convey the purpose of each file, making it a helpful resource for developers working with the deployment setup.
95-111: Remove incorrect claim about .venv preservation.The docker-compose.yaml snippet (lines 95-99) mounts only application code directories (app, workers, scripts, certs), not the
.venv. The.venvis built into the Docker image during the build phase (set in Dockerfile.base line 26:ENV PATH="/app/.venv/bin:$PATH") and is not a mounted volume. Revise to clarify that volume mounts enable live code changes only, while dependencies in the.venvremain part of the built image.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
|



Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.