Skip to content

Remove flowData from getSinglePublicChatbotConfig response#5751

Open
christopherholland-workday wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chatbot-data-leak
Open

Remove flowData from getSinglePublicChatbotConfig response#5751
christopherholland-workday wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
chatbot-data-leak

Conversation

@christopherholland-workday
Copy link
Contributor

flowData contains sensitive information that it shouldn't be. In fact, it looks like the flowData is not used anywhere when this method is called, thus we should remove it.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @christopherholland-workday, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the security posture of the application by preventing the inadvertent exposure of sensitive data through a public API endpoint. It specifically addresses the getSinglePublicChatbotConfig method, ensuring that flowData, which contains confidential information, is no longer included in its response. This change also streamlines the API output by removing data that was not being utilized by the consuming clients.

Highlights

  • Security Enhancement: Removed the flowData field from the getSinglePublicChatbotConfig public API response to prevent the exposure of sensitive information.
  • Code Clarity: Updated an inline comment to explicitly state that flowData contains sensitive data and should not be returned by the public endpoint.
Changelog
  • packages/server/src/services/chatflows/index.ts
    • Removed flowData from the object returned by getSinglePublicChatbotConfig.
    • Updated comments to reflect the removal of sensitive flowData from the public endpoint.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a security concern by removing potentially sensitive flowData from the public-facing getSinglePublicChatbotConfig endpoint. The change is a necessary and good improvement. The suggestion to enhance type safety and maintainability by defining a specific interface for the function's return type is valid and has been kept.

delete parsedConfig.allowedOrigins
delete parsedConfig.allowedOriginsError
return { ...parsedConfig, uploads: uploadsConfig, flowData: dbResponse.flowData, isTTSEnabled }
return { ...parsedConfig, uploads: uploadsConfig, isTTSEnabled }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

While this change is correct in removing the sensitive flowData, the function's return type is any. To improve type safety and maintainability, consider defining a specific interface for the object being returned here and updating the function signature from Promise<any> to use the new interface. This would make the contract of this public-facing function clearer and prevent future issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

Comments