Skip to content

update: eval base url#5738

Closed
0xi4o wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
fix/eval-base-url
Closed

update: eval base url#5738
0xi4o wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
fix/eval-base-url

Conversation

@0xi4o
Copy link
Contributor

@0xi4o 0xi4o commented Feb 10, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @0xi4o, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request modifies the base URL configuration within the evaluation controller. The dynamic retrieval of the base URL from incoming request headers has been replaced with a static assignment to "http://localhost:3000". This change streamlines the base URL definition, likely to facilitate local development or testing environments.

Highlights

  • Evaluation Base URL: The method for determining the base URL used in evaluation services has been updated. Previously, it was dynamically constructed from request headers (x-forwarded-proto and host), but it is now hardcoded to "http://localhost:3000".
Changelog
  • packages/server/src/controllers/evaluations/index.ts
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a hardcoded baseURL for evaluations, which will break the feature in production and staging environments. This appears to be a temporary change for local development that was committed by mistake. It's critical to revert this change to ensure the evaluation functionality works across all environments.

@0xi4o 0xi4o marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2026 09:11
@HenryHengZJ
Copy link
Contributor

issue has been resolved, changes not needed

@0xi4o 0xi4o deleted the fix/eval-base-url branch February 26, 2026 09:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants