Glasgow | 25-ITP-Sep | Hanna Mykytiuk | Sprint 3 | practice-tdd#814
Glasgow | 25-ITP-Sep | Hanna Mykytiuk | Sprint 3 | practice-tdd#814HannaOdud wants to merge 3 commits intoCodeYourFuture:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
2 similar comments
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| let result; | ||
| if (num % 100 == 11 || num % 100 == 12 || num % 100 == 13){ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could consider storing the calculated result in a variable first (and then reuse the calculated value) to improve performance.
|
|
||
| test("should return '2nd' for 2", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(2)).toEqual("2nd"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return '3rd' for 3", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(3)).toEqual("3rd"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return '4th' for 4", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(4)).toEqual("4th"); | ||
| }); | ||
| test("should return '11th' for 11", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(11)).toEqual("11th"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return '12th' for 12", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(12)).toEqual("12th"); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test("should return '13th' for 13", () => { | ||
| expect(getOrdinalNumber(13)).toEqual("13th"); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To ensure thorough testing, we need broad scenarios that cover all possible cases.
Listing individual values, however, can quickly lead to an unmanageable number of test cases.
Instead of writing tests for individual numbers, consider grouping all possible input values into meaningful categories.
Then, select representative samples from each category to test. This approach improves coverage and makes our tests easier to maintain.
For example, we can prepare a test for numbers 2, 22, 132, etc. as
test("append 'nd' to numbers ending in 2, except those ending in 12", () => {
expect( getOrdinalNumber(2) ).toEqual("2nd");
expect( getOrdinalNumber(22) ).toEqual("22nd");
expect( getOrdinalNumber(132) ).toEqual("132nd");
});
Can you make the tests in this script more comprehensive?
| if (count < 0){ | ||
| return null | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This works.
An alternative is to throw an exception.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for advice, I have changed it.
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
1 similar comment
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
1 similar comment
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
cjyuan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please take a look at this PR Guide to find out how to prepare the PR description so that it can pass the automated "Validate PR Metadata" check.
| let rem_100 = num % 100; | ||
| let rem_10 = num % 10; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could consider naming them lastDigit and lastTwoDigits (more human readable).
| test("append 'nd' to numbers ending in 2, except those ending in 12", () => { | ||
| expect( getOrdinalNumber(2) ).toEqual("2nd"); | ||
| expect( getOrdinalNumber(22) ).toEqual("22nd"); | ||
| expect( getOrdinalNumber(132) ).toEqual("132nd"); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is just an example. Why not update the whole test script accordingly to make the test more comprehensive?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks. I have added other tests.
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
1 similar comment
|
Your PR description contained template fields which weren't filled in. Check you've ticked everything in the self checklist, and that any sections which prompt you to fill in an answer are either filled in or removed. If this PR is not coursework, please add the NotCoursework label (and message on Slack in #cyf-curriculum or it will probably not be noticed). |
cjyuan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good.
The PR description is still not in the format expected by the automated "Validate PR Metadata" check.
Learners, PR Template
Self checklist
Changelist
Test driven development practice completed.
Questions
Ask any questions you have for your reviewer.