GLOQC: Add PV contrib vs ITS tracks#14035
Conversation
|
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION RELEASES: This will add The following labels are available |
c832b79 to
cada942
Compare
|
Error while checking build/O2/fullCI_slc9 for cada942 at 2025-03-19 14:08: Full log here. |
Signed-off-by: Felix Schlepper <felix.schlepper@cern.ch>
|
Error while checking build/O2/fullCI_slc9 for 940ffc1 at 2025-04-09 13:34: Full log here. |
| const auto& pvm = mRecoCont.getPrimaryVertexMatchedTrackRefs(); | ||
| for (int i{0}; i < mPVs.size(); ++i) { | ||
| const auto& pv = mPVs[i]; | ||
| const auto& m = pvm[i]; | ||
| // count the number of ITS tracks that were associated to this PV | ||
| // then one can plot the number of tracks contributing to a PV against the available pool | ||
| // (+ ITS tracks only in OB which by constructing cannot contribute). | ||
| Double_t c{0.}; | ||
| for (int src = GIndex::NSources; src--;) { | ||
| if (!GIndex::includesDet(DetID::ITS, src)) { | ||
| continue; | ||
| } | ||
| c += m.getEntriesOfSource(src); | ||
| } | ||
| ((mIsHI) ? mPVNContVsITSTracksPbPb : mPVNContVsITSTracks)->Fill(pv.getNContributors(), c); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @shahor02, does the accounting look correct to you?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry, missed the question...
If the aim is to show the evolution of the pool size vs ncontrib, it is fine, but they will be strongly correlated.
The limits of histos look bit strange: the number of ITS time-associated tracks should be only a few 10% higher than the contributors, not an order of magnitude.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, actually I should have not pinged you, sorry about that. Since I will not be available for the next three weeks, I will close this and afterward continue working on this :)
No description provided.