Skip to content

Comments

Feat/implicit head response validation#238

Merged
daveshanley merged 3 commits intopb33f:mainfrom
saisatishkarra:feat/implicit-head-response-validation
Feb 14, 2026
Merged

Feat/implicit head response validation#238
daveshanley merged 3 commits intopb33f:mainfrom
saisatishkarra:feat/implicit-head-response-validation

Conversation

@saisatishkarra
Copy link
Contributor

@saisatishkarra saisatishkarra commented Feb 13, 2026

Add HEAD response validation for explicit HEAD and implicit GET definition in OAS

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 97.61%. Comparing base (846c366) to head (a3753a1).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #238      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.60%   97.61%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines        5256     5279      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits         5130     5153      +23     
  Misses        126      126              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.61% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@daveshanley daveshanley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Solid.

I would never have caught this! Excellent work.

@daveshanley daveshanley merged commit d8d2c68 into pb33f:main Feb 14, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants