Document upload
Potential needs met: Trusts with existing evaluation processes who want to share findings and access others' work without restructuring their current approach
-We explored how we could accommodate submitting evaluations to the platform, in user friendly formats
@@ -41,10 +41,13 @@We initially explored a simple flow which would enable procurement professionals to submit their own evaluations. This would potentially save time +
We initially explored a simple flow with a basic upload function which would enable procurement professionals to submit their own evaluations. This would potentially save time for trusts looking to share their experiences with products, and help populate the platform with more peer-to-peer intelligence.
+Potential needs met: Trusts with existing evaluation processes who want to share findings and access others' work without restructuring their current approach
-
+ If users consent to contact, we ask what topics they're comfortable discussing (implementation, clinical outcomes, supplier experience). This helps other trusts identify the right person to contact for their specific questions.
Recognising that trusts often evaluate multiple products in comparative assessments, we designed Route A to handle one document linked to multiple product evaluations—avoiding the need to upload the same PDF repeatedly.
- +Recognising that trusts often evaluate multiple products in comparative assessments,from user research findings, we designed another iteration which allows handling of one document linked to multiple product evaluations—avoiding the need to upload the same PDF repeatedly.
+
We iterated on the design to better meet user needs and feedback, while still aligning with our core principles of simplicity and ease of use.
+