Skip to content

Bound on swap steps and its relation to NPHardness #69

@motiwari

Description

@motiwari

If we could reduce the number of swap steps, T, to be polynomial in N, and we could also select polynomial subset of initial conditions (BUILD), from which the SWAP algorithm is gauranteed to find the global optimum, we would have a polynomial time algorithm for performing the combinatorial optimization which is NP-hard, and thus proving P = NP. Not likely.

In the specific case of Gaussian Mixture Model, it may be possible to do this, though; assume k is chosen appropriately, to be the number of clusters. Then each cluster has to have exactly 1 medoid. So the possible intitial conditions are (N/k)^k. And, from other ideas we've discussed, number of swap steps will be <N.

Perhaps you could choose absolutely ANY point in each cluster -- say the first point of each cluster. Then you have an algorithm to do the combinatorial optimization in just <= N steps.

It may be possible to simplify the techniques here using the reduction of BUILD to SWAP.

Think about this some more....

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions