Skip to content

Commit 87b26c4

Browse files
jeremymanninggithub-actions[bot]
authored andcommitted
Auto-solve daily LeetCode problem using GPT-5-mini
1 parent 25bf331 commit 87b26c4

File tree

1 file changed

+75
-0
lines changed

1 file changed

+75
-0
lines changed

problems/3573/gpt5-mini.md

Lines changed: 75 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
1+
# [Problem 3573: Best Time to Buy and Sell Stock V](https://leetcode.com/problems/best-time-to-buy-and-sell-stock-v/description/?envType=daily-question)
2+
3+
## Initial thoughts (stream-of-consciousness)
4+
We can do at most k transactions. A transaction can be a normal buy-then-sell or a short-sell (sell then buy back). For any pair of days i < j the profit from a transaction between i and j is |prices[j] - prices[i]| (we would only take the positive direction). Transactions must be non-overlapping and cannot start on the same day the previous transaction ended (so if previous ended on day j, next must start at day > j).
5+
6+
This looks like a dynamic programming problem similar to the classic "at most k transactions" stock problems (LeetCode 188). The naive DP dp[t][i] = max(dp[t][i-1], max_{s < i} dp[t-1][s] + |p[i]-p[s]|) is O(k * n^2) which is too slow for n up to 1000 and k up to ~500. For the standard problem without short-selling we optimize by tracking a running "best" value of dp[t-1][s-1] - price[s]. Here, the absolute value splits into two linear terms depending on sign: p[i]-p[s] or p[s]-p[i], so we can similarly maintain two running maxima to get O(k*n).
7+
8+
Need to be careful about the "cannot start on same day previous ended" constraint: when adding a transaction that starts at s and ends at i, we must use dp[t-1][s-1] (profit up to day s-1) — not dp[t-1][s] — to avoid allowing immediate reuse of day s.
9+
10+
So split the absolute into two cases and maintain:
11+
- best1 = max over s in [0..i-1] of dp_prev[s-1] - p[s] (handles p[i] + best1)
12+
- best2 = max over s in [0..i-1] of dp_prev[s-1] + p[s] (handles -p[i] + best2)
13+
14+
Then dp_cur[i] = max(dp_cur[i-1], p[i] + best1, -p[i] + best2). Update best1/best2 after computing dp_cur[i] using dp_prev[i-1] (dp_prev[-1] = 0 for s = 0).
15+
16+
## Refining the problem, round 2 thoughts
17+
- We must ensure indices are handled so that transactions don't start on the same day a previous transaction ended: use dp_prev[s-1] in the expressions (with dp_prev[-1] = 0).
18+
- Base cases: dp[0][*] = 0; dp[*][0] = 0 (no profit with zero days or zero transactions).
19+
- Time complexity O(k * n) and space O(n) if we keep only previous and current dp rows.
20+
- Edge cases: small n (2), k up to n//2 per constraints; prices large but only used in additions/subtractions so Python int fine.
21+
22+
This yields a correct and efficient algorithm.
23+
24+
## Attempted solution(s)
25+
```python
26+
from typing import List
27+
28+
class Solution:
29+
def maxProfit(self, k: int, prices: List[int]) -> int:
30+
n = len(prices)
31+
if n < 2 or k == 0:
32+
return 0
33+
34+
# If k is large enough we could capture every adjacent absolute diff by using
35+
# transactions on every adjacent pair, but constraints guarantee k <= n//2.
36+
# We'll use O(k * n) DP.
37+
38+
# dp_prev[i] = max profit using at most (t-1) transactions up to and including day i
39+
dp_prev = [0] * n
40+
41+
for _ in range(1, k + 1):
42+
dp_cur = [0] * n
43+
# best1 = max(dp_prev[s-1] - prices[s]) for s in [0..i-1]
44+
# best2 = max(dp_prev[s-1] + prices[s]) for s in [0..i-1]
45+
# initialize as -inf so that if no s exists (i=0) we don't use them
46+
best1 = float("-inf")
47+
best2 = float("-inf")
48+
49+
for i in range(n):
50+
# carry forward the best without using a transaction ending at i
51+
if i > 0:
52+
dp_cur[i] = dp_cur[i - 1]
53+
else:
54+
dp_cur[i] = 0
55+
56+
# use a transaction that ends at i and starts at some s in [0..i-1]
57+
if best1 != float("-inf"):
58+
dp_cur[i] = max(dp_cur[i], prices[i] + best1)
59+
if best2 != float("-inf"):
60+
dp_cur[i] = max(dp_cur[i], -prices[i] + best2)
61+
62+
# now allow future i' > i to consider starting at s = i:
63+
prev_val = dp_prev[i - 1] if i - 1 >= 0 else 0
64+
best1 = max(best1, prev_val - prices[i])
65+
best2 = max(best2, prev_val + prices[i])
66+
67+
dp_prev = dp_cur
68+
69+
return dp_prev[-1]
70+
```
71+
- Approach notes:
72+
- We use dp over number of transactions. For iteration t we build dp_cur from dp_prev = dp for t-1 transactions.
73+
- For a transaction that starts at s and ends at i (s < i), the gain is |prices[i] - prices[s]| plus dp_prev[s-1] (profit before s). Splitting abs into two linear forms yields two running maxima that let us compute the inner max in O(1) per i.
74+
- Time complexity: O(k * n) where n = len(prices).
75+
- Space complexity: O(n) (we keep two arrays of length n, dp_prev and dp_cur).

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)