Skip to content

Allowing missing OPEN message? #88

@albertodainotti

Description

@albertodainotti

In #86 Alistair mentions:
@dteach-rv (and @kenkeys) is my reading of the RFC correct? Or should we be allowing the missing OPEN message? Assuming I'm correct, perhaps we should let the FRR devs know?

Metadata

Metadata

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions